Search
Facebook Twitter RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: June 9, 2010

Addenda:

 

Antibody titration testing for pregnant women with very weak red cell alloantibodies

A California blood banker reports on two different pregnant women who have very low titer antibodies. One patient has Anti-E and the other patient has Anti-M. Both women were in their first trimester when the initial prenatal antibody detection testing was performed. Both have weak reactivity with neat (undiluted) plasma and no reactivity with 1:1 dilution. The inquiring blood banker asks if colleagues would perform a titration study for such known weak antibodies if the baseline titer is <1, and especially if the result of a current antibody screen is the same as a previous one? In order to attempt to answer this question for her own institution, the inquiring colleague's blood bank has reviewed 3 years of data of 15 different prenatal patients with single antibodies that reacted weakly on neat plasma with no reactivity on diluted plasma (1:1). 3 series of titrations were performed on each of the 15 patients. The results of the series of titrations were the same as the baseline. The inquiring colleague asks if based on the aforementioned data, would it be safe to discontinue titration on weakly reacting antibodies (granting that the subsequent testing gave the same results), as long as the baseline titer was done and <1?

Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join