Search
Facebook Twitter RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: Sept. 30, 2010

Addenda: Dec. 23, 2010

 

Origin of 4 hour rule for completion of infusion?

The supervisor for a regional medical center in the Central Valley writes: "The Circular of Information For the Use of Human Blood and Blood Components (Revised December 2009) specifies a rate of 4 hours or less for the infusion of a blood component. Does anyone know the origin of this 4 hour rule? Is it evidence-based? Are there reported adverse consequences associated with an infusion lasting for 4.5 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours? I don't find any reference to 'infusion of blood exceeding 4 hours' in the Side Effect and Hazards For Whole Blood and All Blood Components section on pages 5-10. How do you handle an infusion that lasted over 4 hours in your facility? Document with variance/occurrence report? Does anyone consider it a sentinel event?"


The following comments have been received in response.

ADDENDA Dec. 19, 2010

  1. A medical technologist writes: "At our hospital in NE WI, we would ask that the transfusing dept transfuse what they could in 4 hours, and waste the rest. Typically, we try to avoid this situation by having blood supplier dock sterile bags to the unit, so we can split it in half, so that we only transfuse 1/2 over 4 hrs, then they can call for the other 1/2 later."

  2. Editors' note: The prior discussion, When infusion of a blood component is begun just before its expiration date but not completed at the time of expiration, must the infusion be terminated? may be germane to this dicussion.

Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join