Issuance protocols for dispensing blood products using a pneumatic tube system
A transfusion service manager in Ohio has reviewed the following discussions
at the links below, but wants to focus a discussion about the
actual issuance of blood products by the blood bank when using a pneumatic tube
system to deliver the products to the patient care areas.
She reports that her hospital has been sending blood products through
a pneumatic tube system for years, but they are interested
in how other institutions verify a product's information before
releasing it from
the Transfusion Service via the pneumatic tube, since there
is no longer a "transporter" to read off and compare information.
Do others always read the information off verbally with two
technologists? What if only one staff member is covering the blood bank
(off shifts, holidays, weekends)? Do others allow only one tech to verify
the information if the computer is used and products are scanned into
the system?
The following comments have been received.
ADDENDA February 24, 2009
- A transfusion service manager at a
large hospital in Southern California reports that his facility has created a blood
product request slip which includes a clerical
check list that can be performed by
a single Clinical Laboratory Scientist (CLS). Thus, this request slip
can be used to dispense blood products via a pneumatic tube system.
Whenever a blood product request slip is submitted to the blood Bank
via the pneumatic tube system, each of the items of the clerical check
that would normally be performed when issuing blood products face
to face can be signed off by the blood bank CLS, who signs
off on each step as it is completed.
ADDENDA Mar. 30, 2009
- A colleague reports that at her previous place of employment they would transport blood products via a pneumatic tube system, with the exception of crossmatched blood for patients with unexpected alloantibodies. The reason for not using the pneumatic tube system for patients with alloantibodies was a concern over losing a crossmatched unit in the system and the ensuing delay while trying to set up another phenotyped donor unit. According to their protocol, when a pneumatic tube carrier would reach its intended station, the individual retrieving the carrier was to immediately call the blood bank to confirm the carrier had arrived and then to read off the necessary identifying data to the technologist/assistant answering the phone, so that the transaction could be documented in the computer.
Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org
Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator
W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator
Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator
The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.