Search
Facebook RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: Feb. 20, 2009

Addenda: Feb. 24 & Mar. 30, 2009

 

Issuance protocols for dispensing blood products using a pneumatic tube system

A transfusion service manager in Ohio has reviewed the following discussions at the links below, but wants to focus a discussion about the actual issuance of blood products by the blood bank when using a pneumatic tube system to deliver the products to the patient care areas.

She reports that her hospital has been sending blood products through a pneumatic tube system for years, but they are interested in how other institutions verify a product's information before releasing it from the Transfusion Service via the pneumatic tube, since there is no longer a "transporter" to read off and compare information. Do others always read the information off verbally with two technologists? What if only one staff member is covering the blood bank (off shifts, holidays, weekends)? Do others allow only one tech to verify the information if the computer is used and products are scanned into the system?


The following comments have been received.

ADDENDA February 24, 2009

  1. A transfusion service manager at a large hospital in Southern California reports that his facility has created a blood product request slip which includes a clerical check list that can be performed by a single Clinical Laboratory Scientist (CLS). Thus, this request slip can be used to dispense blood products via a pneumatic tube system. Whenever a blood product request slip is submitted to the blood Bank via the pneumatic tube system, each of the items of the clerical check that would normally be performed when issuing blood products face to face can be signed off by the blood bank CLS, who signs off on each step as it is completed.
ADDENDA Mar. 30, 2009
  1. A colleague reports that at her previous place of employment they would transport blood products via a pneumatic tube system, with the exception of crossmatched blood for patients with unexpected alloantibodies. The reason for not using the pneumatic tube system for patients with alloantibodies was a concern over losing a crossmatched unit in the system and the ensuing delay while trying to set up another phenotyped donor unit. According to their protocol, when a pneumatic tube carrier would reach its intended station, the individual retrieving the carrier was to immediately call the blood bank to confirm the carrier had arrived and then to read off the necessary identifying data to the technologist/assistant answering the phone, so that the transaction could be documented in the computer.

Submit Comments to the e-Network Forum below:

Items marked with an asterisk (*) are required entries. Please note that there is a 60 minute time-out on this form. if one anticipates taking more than 30 minutes or so to compose the submission, we recommend composing your comments in a word processing application, and performing a copy and paste of your text into the comments field.
* Name
Title
Affiliation
* email address
* Enter email address again to verify
* Do you wish to have attribution for your comments?



* Your Comments
*Please indicate if this is a new question, or if you are commenting on an existing discussion:

New Question
Existing, Name:
 File Attachments
(2MB limit)
To help us prevent SPAM, you must enter the the validation code EXACTLY AS IT IS DISPLAYED in the image directly to the right of the text entry field below in order to submit this form. Please note that the validation code is CASE SENSITIVE.
captcha

 

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Assistant Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join