Search
Facebook RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: Mar. 24, 2009

Addenda: Mar. 30, 2009

 

 

'Flagging' abnormal blood bank test results

A transfusion service medical director reports that his laboratory received an inquiry from an physician as to why the transfusion service computer does NOT flag abnormal results. The complaint referenced an obstetrical patient with a positive antibody screen. The transfusion service medical director's answer was that their "best-of-breed" transfusion service computer does not support results flagging. The inquiring colleague is interested in hearing thoughts about whether transfusion service computer systems should support results flagging, and if so, which results should be flagged. For example, if the computer could flag a positive antibody screen or a positive direct antiglobulin test, should these results be flagged? Should other blood bank abnormal results be flagged? Do any institutions currently use a computer system that flags abnormal blood bank results, and if so, which ones?


The following replies were submitted in response to the above:

ADDENDA Mar. 30, 2009

  1. A blood banker in Indiana reports that their blood bank computer system does not flag abnormal "Antibody-type" or "Crossmatch-type" results. Therefore, they define certain results as critical, requiring the blood bank staff to call an appropriate person. A new positive antibody screen on an obstetrics patient is on their critical list, as is an incompatible crossmatch. Their system will flag "Test-type" results as abnormal. A positive DAT will flag as abnormal. As with any computer system, they manage its quirks by developing workarounds.

Submit Comments to the e-Network Forum below:

Items marked with an asterisk (*) are required entries. Please note that there is a 60 minute time-out on this form. if one anticipates taking more than 30 minutes or so to compose the submission, we recommend composing your comments in a word processing application, and performing a copy and paste of your text into the comments field.
* Name
Title
Affiliation
* email address
* Enter email address again to verify
* Do you wish to have attribution for your comments?



* Your Comments
*Please indicate if this is a new question, or if you are commenting on an existing discussion:

New Question
Existing, Name:
 File Attachments
(2MB limit)
To help us prevent SPAM, you must enter the the validation code EXACTLY AS IT IS DISPLAYED in the image directly to the right of the text entry field below in order to submit this form. Please note that the validation code is CASE SENSITIVE.
captcha

 

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Assistant Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join