What red cell products are ECMO centers using by age (of RBC) and anticoagulant?
A colleague comments that an e-Network Forum document posted HERE regarding ECMO from 2004 indicated that “transfusion of AS1/3 RBCs are tolerated as well as CPD/A RBCs by infants on ECMO, suggesting that the removal of supernatant or washing is unnecessary”. She wonders if any relevant additional data or practice experience have been reported in the past 4 years?
The following comments have been received.
ADDENDA August 29, 2008
- A transfusion medicine physician in upstate New York reports that his hospital does not have any ECMO related blood storage time restrictions except that for newborn infants they use blood stored less than 3 weeks, wash the red cells before using them, and give only ABO identical red cells, platelets, FFP and cryoprecipitate. They do not wash red cells for older children, nor do they have time restrictions on storage beyond the label expiration date, but they do give only ABO identical components. He acknowledges that the washing and storage strategies for newborns are largely historical in his institution although there is some, probably legitimate, concern about potassium load in unwashed/older red cells. Since most of their infants being treated have acidosis and borderline high normal potassium levels, they have chosen not to change their policy and stop using washed red cells. They rarely do ECMO for non-pediatric patients and when they do, the outcomes are not good.
Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org
Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator
W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator
Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator
The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.