Search
Facebook Twitter RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: Jan. 2, 2007

Addenda:

 

Fluid replacement practices in plasma exchange when FFP alone is not indicated

A Medical Director in the Northeast writes that he is curious about the fluid replacement practices in plasma exchange when FFP alone is not indicated. He writes that one facility he worked at used 5% albumin on a 1:1 basis with supplements of 4 mEq/L K+ and 2 mEq/L Ca+2 as an isovolemic replacement for plasma. Another facility he worked at used 5% albumin for all but 1.5L of the procedure, and 3 L of normal saline to replace the other 1.5 L, (the extra volume of NS was intended to leave the patient isovolemic after the crystalloid redistributes into extravascular volume), but checked the patient's K+ and Ca+2 pre-procedure, mid-procedure, and post-procedure. He currently sees some practitioners using 5% albumin for 80% of the replacement volume and NS at a 1:1 ratio for the other 20%. Compared with a 2:1 NS replacement ratio, this may leave the patient with a net loss of intravascular volume after redistribution (as this is roughly equivalent to using 4% albumin). He inquires what other practices are out there and how the practices compare with respect to the patient's final intravascular volume.


Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join