When is additional RhIG required?
The Transfusion Safety Officer at a large community
teaching hospital in
Canada reports that they issue 300 µg doses of
RhIG for all routine
indications (and more if indicated by fetal cell screening
test). They have
received a request from their obstetrical nursing
staff to "supply a simple
rule for when repeat doses of RhIG are required if the
patient has had a
recent injection."
By way of example, "if a patient has received RhIG in ER on Monday
for a
threatened abortion and is then admitted to the hospital
for a D&C on
Thursday, do they need a second RhIG post D&C? Or if a patient has
received
RhIG following amniocentesis and then returns two weeks
later for a
termination, do they require a second dose of RhIG?" She has searched
the
literature and product monographs and has not found reference
to these
scenarios.
How is this handled at your facility? Is there a simple
rule to determine
RhIG dosing, or is it best calculated on a case by
case basis?
Any "simple" rule would have to handle doses for abortion,
amniocentesis
chorionic villus sampling, and routine dosing during pregnancy.
She asks "Does prior RhIG equate to forgoing additional RhIG
for all patients who
have received a full 300 µg dose within the previous few
weeks? If so, what
is the time limit before additional RhIG is required?"
She adds that "any insight you can provide is greatly appreciated."
ADDENDA Jan. 1, 2008
- A Scientific Training Coordinator
of the National Blood Service (Liverpool) in the UK suggests
that perhaps the latest UK guidelines could offer
some support to the Canadian colleague. These guidelines can
be found HERE.
ADDENDA Jan. 9, 2008
- Paul Holland, MD offers the following comment
regarding the discussion of when enough RhIg has been administered. "A
venous sample could be drawn around 3
days after the dose is injected
IM or the next day if given
IV. If an antibody screen reveals free anti-D,
then enough has been delivered. If not, then additional RhIg should be
given, as determined by a test to quantitate the amount of D+ cells circulating.
This was the approach we used to prevent Rh immunization when Rh+ cells
were given inadvertently, or on purpose, to a woman of child bearing potential
in whom we wanted to prevent sensitization. Please note, the additional
dose(s) could be given up to a month after the delivery of an Rh+ child
to an Rh- mother and it will work just about as well as when given within
3 days, per a study by Pollack et al. in Transfusion around 1968.
ADDENDA Jan. 25, 2008
- Professor John Judd comments
that he disagrees
with the comment above by Paul Holland regarding when enough
RhIG has been given. His disagreement is based on
a paper by Ness and Salamon entitled The
failure of post-injection Rh immune globulin titers to
detect large fetal-maternal hemorrhages. Am J Clin Path 1986 May;85(5):604-6.
Accordingly, the Guidelines
for Prenatal and Perinatal Immunohematology, published by the AABB, do
not support Dr. Holland's comment.
Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org
Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator
W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator
Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator
The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.