header
  Search CBBS Website

Disposition of recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) that has been dispensed for patient use, but returned unused

A lead technologist of a transfusion service laboratory at a university hospital in Massachusetts reports that her staff issued a 4.8 mg vial of recombinant rFVIIa to the emergency room for treatment of a bleeding patient, only to have the vial returned unused and unopened five hours later. Since the drug was not refrigerated during the time that it was out of the blood bank's control, the blood bank staff were wondering what to do with the product. They are reluctant to discard the vial, since it costs about $5000 to replace. They contacted the drug manufacturer for guidance. The manufacturer provided written correspondence that strongly cautioned against using the drug, saying:

  1. it does not recommend use of its products in any manner other than as described in its prescribing information

  2. it does not recommend use of the drug when stored outside refrigerated conditions prior to reconstitution

  3. the effects of administering improperly stored drug are unknown

However, the written correspondence implied that the estimated shelf life of the drug is reduced by approximately four months for each day of storage at 25C, while protected from light.

The inquiring colleague wonders if her lab should change the expiration date of the drug and shorten the shelf life of the vial by 4 months, or just discard the vial. What would others do?


The following comments have been received.

ADDENDA Mar. 27, 2007

1. A transfusion medicine physician in Detroit reports that she would discard the product. She comments "There are too many unknowns here to take a chance on the potency of the drug when it has been improperly stored. What if you were to later use this product and a patient had a reaction? Never mind whether it had anything to do with the storage of the product. With documentation that you had been advised by the manufacturer not to use the product and then done so, this would put you in a bad position." She suggests that the wastage of such an expensive drug be brought to the attention of the hospital administration and that it be investigated whether the financial loss can be charged to the responsible department!

Please submit comments to the e-Network Forum.

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Assistant Editor & Moderator

Printable PDF of this page


Posted: Mar. 21, 2007

Addenda: Mar. 27, 2007

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.