header
  Search CBBS Website

How do Trauma Facilities limit use of uncrossmatched trauma blood?

Dr. Leorosa Lehman (attribution given by request) from Erie County Medical Center reports that their facility is struggling to limit use of uncrossmatched trauma blood. She has been asked by the transfusion committee to pose the following questions to our readers who work at TRAUMA CENTERS:

  1. Do you have a policy capping the maximum units of uncrossmatched blood you would release without a sample?

  2. If so, would you allow exceptions? Example: A patient is exsanguinating: would you continue to issue uncrossmatched units as requested by the OR until such time the patient no longer requires blood, and once patient has received 6 units of blood, would your center just continue to give Group O's (O-pos for males & non-reproductive age women)?

  3. If not, how do you limit the number of units of uncrossmatched blood in trauma?

The following comments have been received.

ADDENDA Oct. 26, 2006

1. The Medical Director at a University Trauma Center in Southern California comments that they aggressively pursue an early sample from the OR by hand-delivering the blood to the ED and waiting for the ED staff to draw a crossmatch sample. He says that this doesn't always work out, as it may be difficult to draw a patient during initial critical care. He notes, "it is safer to continue transfusing uncrossmatched blood than to let a patient exsanguinate, so there is no way to safely cap the number of uncrossmatched units released in an emergency."

Please submit comments to the e-Network Forum.

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Assistant Editor & Moderator

Printable PDF of this page


Posted: October 26, 2006

Addenda: Oct. 26, 2006

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.