header
  Search CBBS Website

Prophylactic Rh phenotype matching for patients demonstrating anti-E or anti-C

A colleague in Hungary is interested to learn how others would approach the selection of donor RBC units for patients who have the following Rh phenotype and antibody combinations (see scenarios #1& #2 below), because she is aware that there is a risk of alloimmunization to c (Rh4) in R1R1 patients who present with anti-E.

Scenario #1: A patient is R1R1, has anti-E, and needs an RBC transfusion.
Scenario #2: A patient is R2R2, has anti-C, and needs an RBC transfusion.

Do colleagues select R1R1 donor RBCs for patients in scenario #1 or merely select donor RBCs that are E-negative? Do colleagues select R2R2 donor RBCs for patients in scenario #2, or merely select donor RBCs that are C-negative?


The following comments have been received.

1. A colleague in Alaska reports that when a (big) E negative patient has anti-E, they type the patient for (little) c.  If the patient is both (little) c and (big) E negative they select (big) E and (little) c negative donor RBC units for transfusion.  In the case a (big) C negative patient has anti-C, they provide (big) C negative RBCs, but they do not do any additional testing to determine if the patient is (little) e negative.

ADDENDA Dec. 13, 2004

2. The Scientific Director of a regional blood center in Southern California reports that at this year's AABB annual meeting, Dake et al from the University of Michigan (Transfusion 2004;44:115A) showed that 65% of R1R1 patients with anti-E also had anti-c if a ficin-gel technique was used. The authors supported selection of R1R1 blood for all c negative patients with anti-E.

Printable PDF of this page

Please submit comments to the e-Network Forum.

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Posted: December 12, 2004

Addenda: Dec. 13, 2004

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.