Search
Facebook Twitter RSS
 
 

 

Print

 

Posted: Dec. 18, 2004

Addenda: Dec. 21 & 27, 2004

 

Deferral policies for prospective blood donors who have been "branded" as a result of pledging a fraternity

A colleague in the Carolinas is interested in finding out how different blood centers handle donors who have been "branded" as a result of pledging a fraternity. Branding is a technique for applying 'body art' that involves scarification of the skin by burning it. There are at least two methods of branding; strike and cautery pen. Strike branding is a traditional method of heating pieces of metal (stainless steel) in a flame and pressing them quickly against the skin to create a burn. Each line or curve is a separate piece ("iron"), so one design may consist of many separate strikes with different irons. Cautery pen branding employs a red hot pen tip. With this tool, one can actually "draw" a design on the skin. She reports that at her blood center 'branded" individual are accepted as blood donors so long as the "brand" (wound) is well healed and the iron used to make the brand was red hot in between branding different people. The inquiring colleague's blood center policy is set, in part, because they do several college blood drives, and the fraternity brothers come together to the donor center to make their blood donations. The inquiring colleague has been told that they would lose a significant number of donors and some fraternity sponsors if blood collections were disallowed because of branding. However, she has heard that other centers do defer "branded" individuals for one year. She would like to know what the practice is in the community regarding the acceptability or deferral of branded individuals, and if anyone has actually collected data to support their policy decision.


The following comments have been received.

ADDENDA Dec. 21, 2004

  1. A blood center CEO reports that his organization addresses this scenario by defining tattoo as a "permanent mark or design on the skin by application of pigment or heat." Therefore, potential donors who have undergone this ritual would be subject to a 12-month deferral.

ADDENDA Dec. 27, 2004

  1. A transfusion medicine physician in Sacramento agrees with the above comment. Since she does not know how one could be certain that the branding iron had been thoroughly decontaminated between applications, she would treat a 'branding' like a tattoo and defer the potential donor for 1 year from the date of the branding. The only exception her institution allows for tattoos is the application of permanent makeup in a doctor's office.

Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at enetworkforum@cbbsweb.org

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator

W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.
 
Login Join