header
  Search CBBS Website

What is the experience with using washed red cells for the immediate spin test to reduce the nondetection rate for ABO incompatibility?

An abstract from the recent Australian Society of Blood Transfusion meeting suggests that most of the ABO incompatibilities missed by the "immediate spin" (1.8% in their hands) were resolved by using washed RBCs from the segment in the immediate spin test (Hudson P et al, Transfus Med 2003; 13:106 - pdf file).

A colleague at a blood center in Southern California states that he has not seen this addressed in the US, and wonders if colleagues in the e-network forum have any comments.


The following responses have been received.

ADDENDA June 3, 2003

1. A blood bank medical technologist in Des Moines, Iowa reports that he has crossmatched about 40,000 units during his 30-year career, and so far he has have never seen an immediate spin test that failed to detect an ABO incompatibility. He estimates that he has seen no more than 20 such incompatible crossmatches and in most instances the incompatibility alerted the laboratory that a group A donor unit was inadvertently selected for a group O patient. He reports that he has used both washed and unwashed saline-suspended donor cells over the years.

Webmaster's note: Those in the field should be aware that while the immediate spin crossmatch is a good test for detecting ABO-incompatible donor selections, it is not foolproof. For more details please see the following articles:

Printable PDF of this page

Please submit comments to the e-Network Forum.

Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator

Posted: May 29, 2003

Addenda: June 3, 2003

The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.