Hyperbilirubinemia after transfusing 'older' red cell units to very small neonates
A transfusion medicine physician in Colorado reports that his hospital routinely uses group O Rh negative, CMV-negative AS-5 red cells for their NICU transfusions. The age of these red cells varies over the full (42-day) allowable storage period for the blood product. The inquiring physician recently transfused two very small premies (~800 grams) with small volume red cell aliquots that were within two days of their expiration dates (so that the red cells were considered 'old'). Neither aliquot of red cells was irradiated. Both neonates had appropriate rises in hemoglobin levels but experienced a significant spike in their serum bilirubin levels to 14 and 19 mg/dL respectively. Both subsequently underwent exchange transfusions. The inquiring colleague wonders if others have experienced similar events? Do others limit the use of "older units" in these tiny babies?
The following responses have been received.
- A retired pediatric hematologist in Palo Alto suspects this might have resulted from free hemoglobin in the red cell product, and wonders whether any pink discoloration was observed in the bag's supernate at the time of issue, or in the tube segment. In such immature neonates, it doesn't take much free hemoglobin load to overwhelm their limited ability to metabolize and excrete the catabolized bilirubin.
ADDENDA August 3, 2003
- A colleague in Saudi Arabia reports that regarding neonatal/pre-term baby transfusions: The standard at his hospital in Riyadh is for RBCs to be less than 10 days old, leukocyte-reduced by filtration in the blood bank laboratory, Group O Rh Negative, and irradiated immediately prior to issue.
ADDENDA August 4, 2003
- A colleague in Virginia comments that he finds this case very interesting, and that it touches on several fine points of practice variation in the transfusion medicine world. He queries the colleague who submitted the case to provide the "full scoop" of baby/mother ABO types, volume(s) transfused, location/method of infusion (umbilical vein, atrial catheter), other clinical conditions that may have contributed to the hyperbilirubinemia?
Their policies for transfusing neonates are as follows:
- begin neonates who need RBC transfusions on units <10 days old. Keep the neonate assigned to the same unit of RBCs for "top-off" transfusions until the unit outdates.
- use ONLY RBC units <10 days old for ECMO, surgical bleeding, exchange transfusion, or other large volume transfusions
- irradiate all cellular products for all neonates
- use CPDA-1 red cells for neonates.
ADDENDA August 18, 2003
- In response to some of the above questions, the Colorado physician who submitted this query adds the following information:
- as far as he knows, there was no hemolysis in the blood products before transfusion (they do a visual check of each product before it is released for transfusion)
- Baby A received 13 mL of RBC's through an umbilical catheter. She is group A Rh negative and received group O Rh negative, CMV negative, 40 day old RBC's. Bilirubin went from 5 to 19.7 mg/dL
- Baby B received 12 mL, also via an umbilical catheter. She is group O Rh negative. Bilirubin went from 2.5 to 14.7 mg/dL and she was not exchanged.
- Both babies have maintained relatively stable bilirubin levels since this incident.
- They did change their policy to limit their RBCs to 21 days old for neonatal transfusions.
Submit comments to the e-Network Forum at firstname.lastname@example.org
Ira A. Shulman, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Senior Editor & Moderator
W. Tait Stevens, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Editor & Moderator
Elizabeth M. St. Lezin, MD
CBBS e-Network Forum Associate Editor & Moderator
The e-Network Forum is supported in part by the California Blood Bank Society (CBBS) and the American Red Cross Blood Services (ARCBS) and endorses collegial discussion among blood banking and transfusion medicine professionals. However, neither the CBBS nor the ARCBS in any way endorse the specific views and opinions expressed in the forum. The forum is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice and the content should not be relied upon for any medical or legal purposes. Readers should make their own determinations as to: (i) what constitutes appropriate medical, technical, and administrative practices, and (ii) how best to comply with laws and regulations relevant to their questions. For the latter, they should consider consulting, as to any medical matters, a qualified physician, and, as to any legal matters, an attorney familiar with related state and federal laws. The user of the forum, by accessing same, assumes all risks arising out of such use and releases CBBS and their respective members, directors, officers and agents from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability arising out of such use of the Forum.